For the first time that I can recall, I had a positive response to the idea of living longer than what is considered normal. This is not about immortality or the belief that I have something so important and meaningful to give to the world that it shouldn’t go on without me. No…this is ALL about curiosity. I really, REALLY would like to know how we are in 100 years. I’ve certainly asked myself what life would be like in 5000 years and we all know that any response to that is MCU kind of stuff…fantasy…entertaining, but no more useful than that. To wonder about 100 years from now is a more meaningful exercise. It’s meaningful because we can actually influence the answer. It matters what we say and show to our children and our grand children. It’s their children who will be living with many of our decisions now. They will also be making decisions themselves. I wonder how my great, great, great grand child will live?
Remember when you watched the Jetsons and then in the year 2000 when you shook your head in disappointment that you don’t have a flying car? Well you’re not alone and given where we are today, I think the field is wide open for new implementations of old ideas to run wild and – if you hop on – a wild ride it will be.
I’ll make it official. On the record. I believe that within the next 15 years, odds are better than 50/50 that the non-autonomously driven vehicle will be a rare sight on I95.
I’m happy to be wrong on this! It could be that inner-city autonomous mobility is 1st the pop. If the inner-city pops 1st I’ll increase the odds to 80/20 within 15 years.
Dyson making ventilators? Why not? … as long as they exceed requirements placed on medical devices and whatever other appropriate regulatory oversight matters.
Cleaning and re-using masks? It’s probably been done before. Does it make sense to do it now? Dunno, but someone does.
Point is: There is a crazy batch of BIG ideas being discussed RIGHT NOW. Some of those big ideas (often referred to as those things “that will never happen”) will happen. The least we can do is think about which things might happen and not pretend to be surprised when they happen. The best we can do is decide which ones we want to happen and work to make those happen and discourage the ones we do not want to happen.
Is the administration’s over-the-top reaction to the economic situation a nod to Bernie? The situation is characterized by:
1. The crash in the equities markets,
2. The drastic reduction of commercial activity, travel, retail, recreation, hospitality, services,
3. The significantly increased risk of sickness and death from previously low risk activities.
Of course these are all related and indeed warrant real action. The point is that many of our political operators are behaving and promoting actions that were previously counter to their values. Specifically the idea of giving all Americans cash in order to keep them afloat. Welfare for all? Basic income? The idea of giving businesses cash to pay employees while they can’t work. Sound like another corporate bailout?
In closing, all this could look like re-distribution of wealth without actually making the structural changes that would result in re-distribution as Bernie and others would have it.
I know some might say “too soon” and that’s fine, but let’s not forget what actually happened after it happens.
Remember that cry? I’m not suggesting that the stock market decline is only because of an over-abundance of oil, but … When supply exceeds demand we know what happens.
I asked the question “Why does this president drive people to hate ‘dems’? I despise the shortening of “Democrat” to ‘dem’, BTW.
Anyway, it is clear to me that this president asks his followers to hate rather than think, because hate is the one emotion that washes out every other thing, including rational thought.
I’m sure someone has already spent a lot of resources gaming these scenarios.
1. Current president leaves office before next election.
2. Current president remains in office and does not win the next election.
3. Current president remains in office and wins re-election.
4. Current president leaves office before next election and the administration changes party.
Here we need a decision tree to follow the various possibilities.
Governors! What about the states?
If you’re reading this and have read more than one of my other posts you know I make stuff up. Here’s some more.
I imagine that I remember a couple different definitions of singularity. One is the point when man-made stuff such as computers, exercise greater humaness than their creators.
Another has to do with time and space and somesuch stuff that makes it interesting.
I’m making up another and that is the point where entertainment and information becomes weird. I suggest that we are here.
Impeachment has become entertainment. This is the stuff that we expect our hired(elected) officials to do. Why are we watching it on TV? Is it healthy to put public eyes on public servants doing their duly authorized work? I think no, but invite other perspectives. The delivery of articles of impeachment are no more entertaining than listening to our hired(elected) officials dismiss clear and admitted commission of crimes.
The singularity is here because consumers behave as if there is no difference between what is actually happening/has actually happened and entertainment about what a producer said happened or might happen. The singularity exists because the producer knows this and produces content based on a catalyst known only to the producer.
See. I can still make stuff up.
No, wait…did you miss me!?
I’m concerned about the overall mental health of our country and the risk this presents to our democracy. We already know that isolation leads to decline, mental, social and potentially physical. We all learned that if we’re not a good friend then we won’t have good friends. Good friends who support you in your struggles and celebrate with you when you overcome them.
The world is too small and interconnected to behave as if you are the only one who matters. It is absolutely possible to look out for #1 and retain the support, admiration and goodwill of #2 and beyond.
That’s all for yesterday.
I completely forgot about this until now so here’s what you get.
Tried to use the home virtual machine and found it not working. After a couple hours of trouble-shooting I did it… read … and learned that the AMD Ryzen series of processors need the CSM (compatibility support module) disabled and UEFI full on. Seems to work just fine. That along with another tweak I had to make (maxmem) just to get it to install suggests that AMD might need to get more involved in the open sources community.
That’s it for today unless it’s not
I’m trying to see this a different way, but I can’t. I can only ask again … why?
You’ve seen the Pepsi commercial with the tall, non ethnically identifiable guy, dancing(?), under dance floor lighting which morphs into a sports stadium. The cameraman pans to him, showing him on the big screen just as he takes big ole sip of Pepsi. Okay, cute commercial. Memorable.
Later I see the same commercial except, it’s a clearly brown or black man who is dancing with equal vigor as the other guy, except this guy is holding the tube lights they use to communicate with pilots on airport grounds. He’s wearing the standard, fluorescent-striped work gear. The initial scene is dark and dance floor like. I said I sure hope this brother is not at work. Just then, they show his dancing from the perspective of a co-worker who is driving one of the little cart pulling trucks. The scene then morphs into an operating airport gate area.
Why is that for similar reasons (advertising) the other guy is shown ‘cutting up’ at a football game and the black guy is ‘cutting up’ on the job. Why is that okay?